The conduction rate equation, Fourier’s Law, was previously discussed in this blog entry. We can now consider its origin. Fourier’s Law is phenomenological, i.e., it is developed from observed phenomena rather than being derived from first principles, thus, we consider the rate equation as a generalization based on a lot of experimental evidence.
Let us consider the
steady-state conduction experiment below where a cylindrical rod of known
material is insulated on its lateral surface, while its end faces are
maintained at different temperatures, where T1 > T2.
The temperature
difference causes conduction heat transfer in the positive x-direction. We are
able to measure the heat transfer rate qx, and we seek to determine
how qx depends on the following variables:
- T, the temperature difference;
- x, the rod length;
- A, the cross-sectional area.
We can imagine first
holding ΔT and Δx constant and varying A. Thus, we find that qx is
directly proportional to A. Similarly, holding ΔT and A constant, we see that qx
varies inversely with Δx. Finally, holding A and Δx constant, we find that qx
is directly proportional to ΔT. The collective effect is then:
Even if we change the
material from a metal to a plastic, this proportionality will remain valid. But
we would also find that, for equal values of A, Δx, and ΔT, the value of qx
would be smaller for the plastic than for the metal. This suggests that the proportionality
may be converted to an equality by introducing a coefficient that is a measure of
the material behavior. Thus:
where k, the thermal
conductivity (W/m.K) is an important property of the material.
Evaluating this expression in the limit as x → 0, we obtain the heat rate:
The minus sign is needed
because heat is always transferred in the direction of decreasing temperature.
Fourier’s law, as written
in Equation 2, suggests that the heat flux is a directional quantity. In
particular, the direction of qx′′ is normal to the
cross-sectional area A. Or, more generally, the direction of heat flow will
always be normal to a surface of constant temperature, called an isothermal
surface.
The following figure shows the direction of heat flow qx′′ in a plane wall for which the temperature gradient dT/dx is negative.
From Equation 2, it
follows that qx′′ is positive. Note that the isothermal
surfaces are planes normal to the x-direction.
Recognizing that the heat flux is a vector quantity, we can write a more general statement of the conduction rate equation (Fourier’s law) as follows:
It can be understood through Equation 3 that the heat flux vector is in a direction perpendicular to the isothermal surfaces. An alternative form of Fourier’s law is therefore:
where qn′′ is the heat flux in a direction n, which is normal to an isotherm, and n is the unit normal vector in that direction as shown below:
The heat transfer is sustained by a temperature gradient along n. Note also that the heat flux vector can be resolved into components such that, in Cartesian coordinates, the general expression for q′′ is:
Thus, from equation 3:
Each of the above
expressions relates the heat flux across a surface to the temperature
gradient in a direction perpendicular to the surface. It is also implied in
Equation 3 that the medium in which the conduction occurs is isotropic.
For such a medium, the value of the thermal conductivity is independent of the
coordinate direction.
















